Skip to content
Anchorcite

Douglas G. Altman

University of Oxford

8 papers in the Anchorcite directory, published between 2007 and 2016, cited 191,194 times in total.

ORCID profile

Research topics

Frequent co-authors

Papers

  1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA StatementPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 65,305 citations

    se ha posicionado como un centro de referencia asistencial y académica, con la proyección de conformar clínicas o centros de excelencia.Para lograr este objetivo, es indispensable que realice y se ciña a sus propias guías de práctica clínica o estándares…

  2. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 28,091 citations

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value…

  3. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine · 2007 · 22,460 citations

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations…

  4. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventionsBMJ · 2016 · 20,382 citations

    Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In…

  5. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · 17,961 citations

    Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations…

  6. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsBMC Medicine · 2010 · 13,623 citations

    The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.To encourage dissemination of…

  7. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statementInternational Journal of Surgery · 2010 · 12,348 citations

    Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines. Granting agencies may require…

  8. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guideBMJ · 2014 · 11,024 citations

    Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is…

Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0).