Alessandro Liberati

Research topics

• Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 4 papers
• Health Sciences Research and Education · 3 papers
• Clinical practice guidelines implementation · 1 paper
• Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy · 1 paper
• Traumatic Brain Injury Research · 1 paper
• Delphi Technique in Research · 1 paper

Frequent co-authors

• David Moher · 4 papers
• Jennifer Tetzlaff · 3 papers
• Douglas G. Altman · 3 papers
• Mike J Clarke · 2 papers
• Cynthia D. Mulrow · 1 paper
• Peter Christian Gøtzsche · 1 paper
• John P. A. Ioannidis · 1 paper
• Philip James Devereaux · 1 paper

Papers

1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA StatementPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 65,305 citations

   se ha posicionado como un centro de referencia asistencial y académica, con la proyección de conformar clínicas o centros de excelencia.Para lograr este objetivo, es indispensable que realice y se ciña a sus propias guías de práctica clínica o estándares…

2. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 28,091 citations

   Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value…

3. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementSystematic Reviews · 2015 · 27,164 citations

   Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well…

4. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statementInternational Journal of Surgery · 2010 · 12,348 citations

   Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care. Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field,1,2 and they are often used as a starting point for developing clinical practice guidelines. Granting agencies may require…