Mike J Clarke
Queen's University Belfast
4 papers in the Anchorcite directory, published between 2009 and 2015, cited 86,791 times in total.
ORCID profileResearch topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 4 papers
- Delphi Technique in Research · 3 papers
- Health Sciences Research and Education · 1 paper
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy · 1 paper
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research · 1 paper
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · 1 paper
Frequent co-authors
- David Moher · 4 papers
- Alessandro Liberati · 2 papers
- Jennifer Tetzlaff · 2 papers
- Cynthia D. Mulrow · 2 papers
- Peter Christian Gøtzsche · 2 papers
- John P. A. Ioannidis · 2 papers
- Philip James Devereaux · 2 papers
- Jos Kleijnen · 2 papers
Papers
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 28,091 citations
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value…
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementSystematic Reviews · 2015 · 27,164 citations
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well…
- The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationBMJ · 2009 · 18,000 citations
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to…
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanationBMJ · 2015 · 13,536 citations
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to assess for the presence of selective reporting against completed reviews, and, when…
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0).