Peter Christian Gøtzsche

Research topics

• Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 4 papers
• Delphi Technique in Research · 3 papers
• Reliability and Agreement in Measurement · 2 papers
• Health Sciences Research and Education · 1 paper
• Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy · 1 paper
• Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · 1 paper

Frequent co-authors

• Douglas G. Altman · 3 papers
• Jennifer Tetzlaff · 2 papers
• Cynthia D. Mulrow · 2 papers
• John P. A. Ioannidis · 2 papers
• Mike J Clarke · 2 papers
• Philip James Devereaux · 2 papers
• Jos Kleijnen · 2 papers
• David Moher · 2 papers

Papers

1. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine · 2009 · 28,091 citations

   Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value…

2. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine · 2007 · 22,460 citations

   Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations…

3. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationBMJ · 2009 · 18,000 citations

   Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarise evidence relating to efficacy and safety of healthcare interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, are not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to…

4. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · 17,961 citations

   Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations…