Skip to content

A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies

Viswanath Venkatesh, Fred D. Davis

Management Science · 2000 · 23,094 citationsOpen access

Abstract

The present research develops and tests a theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that explains perceived usefulness and usage intentions in terms of social influence and cognitive instrumental processes. The extended model, referred to as TAM2, was tested using longitudinal data collected regarding four different systems at four organizations (N = 156), two involving voluntary usage and two involving mandatory usage. Model constructs were measured at three points in time at each organization: preimplementation, one month postimplementation, and three months postimplementation. The extended model was strongly supported for all four organizations at all three points of measurement, accounting for 40%–60% of the variance in usefulness perceptions and 34%–52% of the variance in usage intentions. Both social influence processes (subjective norm, voluntariness, and image) and cognitive instrumental processes (job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, and perceived ease of use) significantly influenced user acceptance. These findings advance theory and contribute to the foundation for future research aimed at improving our understanding of user adoption behavior.

Cite this paper

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Read it with every claim anchored

Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.

Start free
  1. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View12003
  2. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM2018
  3. PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet2011
  4. The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing1994
  5. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis2010

Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.