Skip to content
Anchorcite

PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS

Amy L. Kristof‐Brown

Personnel Psychology · 1996 · 4,871 citations

doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive definition and conceptual model of person‐organization fit that incorporates supplementary as well as complementary perspectives on fit. To increase the precision of the construct's definition, it is also distinguished from other forms of environmental compatibility, silch as person‐group and person‐vocation fit. Once defined, commensurate measurement as it relates to supplementary and complementary fit is discussed and recommendations are offered regarding the necessity of its use. A distinction is made between the direct measurement of perceived fit and the indirect measurement of actual person‐organization fit, using both cross‐ and individual‐level techniques, and the debate regarding differences scores is reviewed. These definitional and measurement issues frame a review of the existing literature, as well as provide the basis for specific research propositions and suggestions for managerial applications.

Cite this paper

Kristof‐Brown, A. L. (1996). PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x

Read it with every claim anchored

Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.

Start free

Related papers

  1. Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm1996
  2. Social Identity Theory and the Organization1989
  3. The myopia of learning1993
  4. Structural Holes and Good Ideas2004
  5. Social Identity Theory and the Organization1989

Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.