Vivian Andrea Welch
University of Ottawa
4 papers in the Anchorcite directory, published between 2017 and 2021, cited 142,176 times in total.
ORCID profileResearch topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 4 papers
- Delphi Technique in Research · 4 papers
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research · 3 papers
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · 1 paper
Frequent co-authors
- David Moher · 4 papers
- Matthew James Page · 3 papers
- Joanne E. McKenzie · 3 papers
- Patrick M. Bossuyt · 3 papers
- Isabelle Boutron · 3 papers
- Tammy Hoffmann · 3 papers
- Cynthia D. Mulrow · 3 papers
- Larissa Shamseer · 3 papers
Papers
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsBMJ · 2021 · 107,350 citations
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances…
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsInternational Journal of Surgery · 2021 · 11,970 citations
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances…
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviewsBMJ · 2021 · 11,889 citations
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate…
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothBMJ · 2017 · 10,967 citations
The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions.…
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0).