Isabelle Boutron

Research topics

• Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · 5 papers
• Delphi Technique in Research · 4 papers
• Traumatic Brain Injury Research · 3 papers
• Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · 1 paper
• Primary Care and Health Outcomes · 1 paper
• Health Policy Implementation Science · 1 paper

Frequent co-authors

• Tammy Hoffmann · 4 papers
• Asbjørn Hróbjartsson · 4 papers
• Penny F. Whiting · 4 papers
• David Moher · 4 papers
• Matthew James Page · 3 papers
• Joanne E. McKenzie · 3 papers
• Patrick M. Bossuyt · 3 papers
• Cynthia D. Mulrow · 3 papers

Papers

1. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsBMJ · 2021 · 107,350 citations

   The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances…

2. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventionsBMJ · 2016 · 20,382 citations

   Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I (“Risk Of Bias In…

3. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsInternational Journal of Surgery · 2021 · 11,970 citations

   The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances…

4. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviewsBMJ · 2021 · 11,889 citations

   The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings.The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate…

5. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guideBMJ · 2014 · 11,024 citations

   Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is…