The myopia of learning
Daniel A. Levinthal, James G. March
Strategic Management Journal · 1993 · 7,358 citations
Abstract
Organizational learning has many virtues, virtues which recent writings in strategic management have highlighted. Learning processes, however, are subject to some important limitations. As is well-known, learning has to cope with confusing experience and the complicated problem of balancing the competing goals of developing new knowledge (i.e., exploring) and exploiting current competencies in the face of dynamic tendencies to emphasize one or the other. We examine the ways organizations approach these problems through simplification and specialization and how those approaches contribute to three forms of learning myopia, the tendency to overlook distant times, distant places, and failures, and we identify some ways in which organizations sustain exploration in the face of a tendency to overinvest in exploitation. We conclude that the imperfections of learning are not so great as to require abandoning attempts to improve the learning capabilities of organizations, but that those imperfections suggest a certain conservatism in expectations.
Cite this paper
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage1991
- Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage2004
- Dynamic capabilities and strategic management1997
- A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation1994
- Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance2007
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.