Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram

Abstract

A diagram has been devised that can provide a concise statistical summary of how well patterns match each other in terms of their correlation, their root‐mean‐square difference, and the ratio of their variances. Although the form of this diagram is general, it is especially useful in evaluating complex models, such as those used to study geophysical phenomena. Examples are given showing that the diagram can be used to summarize the relative merits of a collection of different models or to track changes in performance of a model as it is modified. Methods are suggested for indicating on these diagrams the statistical significance of apparent differences and the degree to which observational uncertainty and unforced internal variability limit the expected agreement between model‐simulated and observed behaviors. The geometric relationship between the statistics plotted on the diagram also provides some guidance for devising skill scores that appropriately weight among the various measures of pattern correspondence.

Cite this paper

Related papers

1. The ERA5 global reanalysis2020
2. The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project1996
3. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system2011
4. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas2005
5. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas2017