Optimization of conditional value-at-risk
Ralph Tyrrell Rockafellar, Stan Uryasev
The Journal of Risk · 2000 · 6,757 citations
Abstract
A new approach to optimizing or hedging a portfolio of financial instruments to reduce risk is presented and tested on applications. It focuses on minimizing Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) rather than minimizing Value-at-Risk (VaR), but portfolios with low CVaR necessarily have low VaR as well. CVaR, also called Mean Excess Loss, Mean Shortfall, or Tail VaR, is anyway considered to be a more consistent measure of risk than VaR. Central to the new approach is a technique for portfolio optimization which calculates VaR and optimizes CVaR simultaneously. This technique is suitable for use by investment companies, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and any business that evaluates risks. It can be combined with analytical or scenario-based methods to optimize portfolios with large numbers of instruments, in which case the calculations often come down to linear programming or nonsmooth programming. The methodology can be applied also to the optimization of percentiles in contexts outside of finance.
Cite this paper
Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2000.038
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities1973
- CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*1964
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance1997
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns1992
- Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency1993
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.