Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.
Judith H. Langlois, Lisa Kalakanis, Adam J. Rubenstein, Monica Hallam, Monica Smoot
Psychological Bulletin · 2000 · 2,358 citations
Abstract
Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.
Cite this paper
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks1997
- Emotion Regulation: Current Status and Future Prospects2015
- Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self‐report questionnaire?1994
- The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates1982
- Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia1983
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.