Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.

Abstract

The learned helplessness hypothesis is criticized and reformulated. The old hypothesis, when applied to learned helplessness in humans, has two major problems: (a) It does not distinguish between cases in which outcomes are uncontrollable for all people and cases in which they are uncontrollable only for some people (univervsal vs. personal helplessness), and (b) it does not explain when helplessness is general and when specific, or when chronic and when acute. A reformulation based on a revision of attribution theory is proposed to resolve these inadequacies. According to the reformulation, once people perceive noncontingency, they attribute their helplessness to a cause. This cause can be stable or unstable, global or specific, and internal or external. The attribution chosen influences whether expectation of future helplessness will be chronic or acute, broad or narrow, and whether helplessness will lower self-esteem or not. The implications of this reformulation of human helplessness for the learned helplessness model of depression are outlined.

Cite this paper

Related papers

1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.1986
2. A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder2006
3. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note1997
4. Detection of Postnatal Depression1987
5. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support1988