Skip to content

Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.

Todd F. Heatherton, Janet Polivy

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1991 · 1,958 citations

Abstract

This article examines the measurement of short-lived (i.e., state) changes in self-esteem. A new scale is introduced that is sensitive to manipulations designed to temporarily alter self-esteem, and 5 studies are presented that support the scale's validity. The State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES) consists of 20 items modified from the widely used Janis-Field Feelings of Inadequacy Scale (Janis & Field, 1959). Psychometric analyses revealed that the SSES has 3 correlated factors: performance, social, and appearance self-esteem. Effects of naturally occurring and laboratory failure and of clinical treatment on SSES scores were examined; it was concluded that the SSES is sensitive to these sorts of manipulations. The scale has many potential uses, which include serving as a valid manipulation check index, measuring clinical change in self-esteem, and untangling the confounded relation between mood and self-esteem. There has been a resurgence of interest in examining whether aspects of the self-concept are stable or malleable (Markus & Kunda, 1986). On the one hand, there is considerable evidence that the self-concept is persistent and stable and that people will actively seek information that confirms their self-concept and reject information that threatens their general view of self

Cite this paper

Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895

Read it with every claim anchored

Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.

Start free
  1. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review2001
  2. The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change1997
  3. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 12002
  4. Bad is Stronger than Good2001
  5. Human agency in social cognitive theory.1989

Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.