Attention and the detection of signals.
Michael I. Posner, Charles R. R. Snyder, Brian J. Davidson
Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 1980 · 3,680 citations
Abstract
Detection of a visual signal requires information to reach a system capable of eliciting arbitrary responses required by the experimenter. Detection latencies are reduced when subjects receive a cue that indicates where in the visual field the signal will occur. This shift in efficiency appears to be due to an alignment (orienting) of the central attentional system with the pathways to be activated by the visual input. It would also be possible to describe these results as being due to a reduced criterion at the expected target position. However, this description ignores important constraints about the way in which expectancy improves performance. First, when subjects are cued on each trial, they show stronger expectancy effects than when a probable position is held constant for a block, indicating the active nature of the expectancy. Second, while information on spatial position improves performance, information on the form of the stimulus does not. Third, expectancy may lead to improvements in latency without a reduction in accuracy. Fourth, there appears to be little ability to lower the criterion at two positions that are not spatially contiguous. A framework involving the employment of a limited-capacity attentional mechanism seems to capture these constraints better than the more general language of criterion setting. Using this framework, we find that attention shifts are not closely related to the saccadic eye movement system. For luminance detection the retina appears to be equipotential with respect to attention shifts, since costs to unexpected stimuli are similar whether foveal or peripheral. These results appear to provide an important model system for the study of the relationship between attention and the structure of the visual system.
Cite this paper
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 109(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.1982
- An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function2001
- The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.1958
- FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data2010
- A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis1998
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.