An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
2000 · 12,714 citations
Abstract
Abstract The initial stimulus for the theorizing presented here was provided by certain experimental investigations of intergroup behavior. The laboratory analog of real-world ethnocentrism is in-group bias—that is, the tendency to favor the in-group over the out-group in evaluations and behavior. Not only are incompatible group interests not always sufficient to generate conflicts but there is a good deal of experimental evidence that these conditions are not always necessary for the development of competition and discrimination between groups (for example, Ferguson & Kelley, 1964; Rabbie & Wilkens, 1971; Doise & Sinclair, 1973; Doise & Weinberger, 1973).
Cite this paper
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict (pp. 56–65). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.1986
- A Theory of Social Comparison Processes1954
- Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective2001
- The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior2004
- The weirdest people in the world?2010
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.