All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins
Alexander D. MacKerell, Donald Bashford, M. Bellott, Roland L. Dunbrack, Jeffrey D. Evanseck, Martin J. Field, Stefan Fischer, Jun Gao, Hong Xu Guo, Sookhee Ha, Diane Joseph‐McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, Krzysztof Kuczera, Frankie Tat Kwong Lau, Carla Mattos, Stephen W. Michnick, Dzung T. Nguyen, Blaise Prod'hom, W. E. Reiher, Benoı̂t Roux, Michael Schlenkrich, Jeremy C. Smith, Roland H. Stote, John E. Straub, Masakatsu Watanabe, Joanna Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, Martin Karplus
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 1998 · 14,683 citations
Abstract
New protein parameters are reported for the all-atom empirical energy function in the CHARMM program. The parameter evaluation was based on a self-consistent approach designed to achieve a balance between the internal (bonding) and interaction (nonbonding) terms of the force field and among the solvent-solvent, solvent-solute, and solute-solute interactions. Optimization of the internal parameters used experimental gas-phase geometries, vibrational spectra, and torsional energy surfaces supplemented with ab initio results. The peptide backbone bonding parameters were optimized with respect to data for N-methylacetamide and the alanine dipeptide. The interaction parameters, particularly the atomic charges, were determined by fitting ab initio interaction energies and geometries of complexes between water and model compounds that represented the backbone and the various side chains. In addition, dipole moments, experimental heats and free energies of vaporization, solvation and sublimation, molecular volumes, and crystal pressures and structures were used in the optimization. The resulting protein parameters were tested by applying them to noncyclic tripeptide crystals, cyclic peptide crystals, and the proteins crambin, bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, and carbonmonoxy myoglobin in vacuo and in crystals. A detailed analysis of the relationship between the alanine dipeptide potential energy surface and calculated protein φ, χ angles was made and used in optimizing the peptide group torsional parameters. The results demonstrate that use of ab initio structural and energetic data by themselves are not sufficient to obtain an adequate backbone representation for peptides and proteins in solution and in crystals. Extensive comparisons between molecular dynamics simulations and experimental data for polypeptides and proteins were performed for both structural and dynamic properties. Energy minimization and dynamics simulations for crystals demonstrate that the latter are needed to obtain meaningful comparisons with experimental crystal structures. The presented parameters, in combination with the previously published CHARMM all-atom parameters for nucleic acids and lipids, provide a consistent set for condensed-phase simulations of a wide variety of molecules of biological interest.
Cite this paper
MacKerell, A. D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack, R. L., Evanseck, J. D., Field, M. J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H. X., Ha, S., Joseph‐McCarthy, D., Kuchnir, L., Kuczera, K., Lau, F. T. K., Mattos, C., Michnick, S. W., Ngo, T., Nguyen, D. T., Prod’hom, B., … Karplus, M. (1998). All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 102(18), 3586–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp973084f
Read it with every claim anchored
Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.
Start freeRelated papers
- A short history of SHELX2007
- UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis2004
- Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold2021
- AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading2009
- Features and development of Coot2010
Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.