Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions

Abstract

This article provides researchers with a guide to properly construe and conduct analyses of conditional indirect effects, commonly known as moderated mediation effects. We disentangle conflicting definitions of moderated mediation and describe approaches for estimating and testing a variety of hypotheses involving conditional indirect effects. We introduce standard errors for hypothesis testing and construction of confidence intervals in large samples but advocate that researchers use bootstrapping whenever possible. We also describe methods for probing significant conditional indirect effects by employing direct extensions of the simple slopes method and Johnson-Neyman technique for probing significant interactions. Finally, we provide an SPSS macro to facilitate the implementation of the recommended asymptotic and bootstrapping methods. We illustrate the application of these methods with an example drawn from the Michigan Study of Adolescent Life Transitions, showing that the indirect effect of intrinsic student interest on mathematics performance through teacher perceptions of talent is moderated by student math self-concept.

Cite this paper

Related papers

1. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.1986
2. A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder2006
3. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note1997
4. Detection of Postnatal Depression1987
5. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support1988