Skip to content

Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments

Douglas O. Staiger, James H. Stock

Econometrica · 1997 · 7,514 citations

Abstract

This paper develops asymptotic distribution theory for instrumental variable regression when the partial correlation between the instruments and a single included endogenous variable is weak, here modeled as local to zero. Asymptotic representations are provided for various instrumental variable statistics, including the two-stage least squares (TSLS) and limited information maximum- likelihood (LIML) estimators and their t-statistics. The asymptotic distributions are found to provide good approximations to sampling distributions with just 20 observations per instrument. Even in large samples, TSLS can be badly biased, but LIML is, in many cases, approximately median unbiased. The theory suggests concrete quantitative guidelines for applied work. These guidelines help to interpret Angrist and Krueger's (1991) estimates of the returns to education: whereas TSLS estimates with many instruments approach the OLS estimate of 6%, the more reliable LIML and TSLS estimates with fewer instruments fall between 8% and 10%, with a typical confidence interval of (6%, 14%).

Cite this paper

Staiger, D. O., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171753

Read it with every claim anchored

Add this paper to a project, ask questions of it, and get answers that point to the exact passage.

Start free
  1. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations1991
  2. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth1986
  3. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence2007
  4. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test1999
  5. What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data1995

Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0). Citations are generated from the published record.